Skip to content

Stirchley Tesco and Lidl update – what now?

March 2, 2017

Behind the scenes we have been very busy. We are currently receiving ongoing support from the Environmental Law Foundation with free legal advice on whether it is worth proceeding with a Judicial Review (JR). We know that the JR route is expensive and there are very few judgments overturned… but we think we have a good case on several fronts. What a JR, or the threat of one, can do is give the council a chance to reconsider its decision. “This may mean that the public body will be able to make the same decision again, so long as it does so in a lawful way.” –

Time is short on the JR process. We have to serve a Letter of Intent on the council informing them that we’re requesting a Judicial Review within six weeks of the final decision (9 February) and allow them 2 weeks to respond. This gets the wheels in motion.

If we do proceed to the full JR, we need to fundraise for this, which is a lot to ask the local community, we know. If you would be willing to back this campaign financially – whether that’s £1 or a considerable amount more – then please stay in touch with us either on this blog, via email on our Facebook or Twitter. If you have any ideas for fundraising, or would be able to help with a Kickstarter (or equivalent crowd funding) if it comes to it, please do say. We’re looking at a maximum of £50k in legal fees for the JR process if it comes to it… that’s £22 per signature on the 38degrees petition and less than a month’s membership at Fitness First.

The petition has reached 2,300 signatures and is growing. PLEASE SIGN AND SHARE.

We’re discussing a second protest, on a weeknight this time. We have a date pencilled in but we need to discuss with Fitness First and PSL Bowling first… placards at the ready!

Tesco has backed out of its plans to build in Stirchley, 17 years after its first commitment to build. At this stage, we don’t know how this is going to affect the SuperStirchley campaign against Birmingham City Council’s U-turn on the Lidl decision but we are eager to see the council working with locals and the site owner Tesco to have a say in what plans we’d like to see.

Tesco has said it is willing to sell the land to other supermarkets – could Lidl be swayed to move on to some of the land Tesco owns instead of demolishing local leisure and fitness facilities? We can understand the disappointment felt by residents after a long wait but we see this as a huge opportunity for Stirchley to have some real infrastructure plans put into place which don’t include being dictated by a supermarket’s huge blueprints.

Dates for your diary:

Monday 13 March – Stirchley Neighbourhood Forum meeting, 7.30pm, Stirchley Community Church

Wednesday 15 March – Stirchley the Way Forward meeting, 7.30pm, Stirchley Baths

Stirchley turns out to protest against Lidl

February 11, 2017

stirchley-anti-lidl-demo-27Around 60 residents attended a demonstration in Stirchley today as cars hooted in support to protest against Birmingham City Council’s u-turn decision to allow Lidl UK to knock down local leisure facilities and build a supermarket on the site instead.

stirchley-anti-lidl-demo-5The demo was attended by  local MP Steve McCabe (pictured, right), Labour councillors Mary Locke (pictured, left) and Karen McCarthy, Momentum South Birmingham, Friends of Stirchley Park, Friends of Cannon Hill Park, Stirchley Happenings, Stirchley Community Market, Super Stirchley, as well as local residents affected by the decision.

Many are angry that concerns – over traffic, jobs, too many supermarkets in Stirchley, other available derelict sites for development, and the loss of leisure and sports facilities – are being ignored. They are also concerned that this planning decision (and others In Birmingham) are being rubber-stamped because the council can’t afford to fight appeals from developers.

stirchley-anti-lidl-demo-33Placards and banners called for a boycott of Lidl and for local government to favour health over wealth, to listen to local residents and to stand up for Stirchley against a number of supermarkets wanting to build here. Protestors shouted: “Save our gym and bowling!” and “Lidl is a fiddle!”

stirchley-anti-lidl-demo-13Steve McCabe, MP for Birmingham Selly Oak, later tweeted: “Big turn out despite cold at Fitness First protest. Think again Lidl this is a supermarket that will never be popular.

“The council should have refused the application but Lidl are the people who can stop it now… They are demolishing our gym and bowling alley to build supermarket nobody wants. We’ll have more supermarkets per square mile than anywhere else…”

Fitness First gym, which has a thriving community of 3500 members, and PSL Bowling, a family business with many ties in the local community through school and charity groups, both want to stay on the site but are under threat of demolition.

The council was initially minded to refuse Lidl’s application but then suddenly made a u-turn In December, approving Lidl’s planning application despite hundreds of complaints and comments to the council’s planning committee and a petition, which now stands at 2,250 signatures against. The decision was formally approved this week.

Further background on this story can be found on SuperStirchley’s campaign post. We have also gathered the local response to this by local residents and councillors. And the message is clear: No Lidl here!

More photos/videos from the protest can be found below (we’ll add to this list as we go). Please feel free use and share CC images:

Decision officially approved. Thurs 9th Feb.

February 9, 2017



January 28, 2017



When: 12 noon, Sat 11 February (for 30 minutes)

Where: In the car park of the Fitness First*

What to bring: yourself, banners, a strong voice, lots of people!

Why: we want to send a strong, clear message that Lidl is not wanted if it means sacrificing popular local fitness/leisure facilities.

What you can do: share news of this protest as widely as you can and sign the petition now over 2000 signatures strong.

Join us in a protest against Birmingham City Council’s U-turn on 22 December allowing Lidl to knock down Stirchley’s only local leisure/fitness facilities: the Fitness First Gym and PSL Bowling Alley. Join us if you’re worried about Stirchley being overrun by supermarkets. Join us if you’re tired of Tesco’s wasteland and empty promises. Join us if you think Birmingham City Council planning committee has let Stirchley down and not properly considered the impact on jobs, traffic, fitness, leisure, independent shops and community culture – or the many comments and complaints of local people.

In short, join us if you want to Stand Up For Stirchley. Come and make some noise!

*please be mindful of traffic – safety first!


Discussion about Lidl planning decision in Stirchley on BBC WM 04/01/2017

January 4, 2017

Discussion about Birmingham City Council’s planning decision on the Lidl development in Stirchley, broadcast on BBC WM on 4th January 2017 currently available to listen to on BBC iPlayer.

Stirchley responds to the decision

January 2, 2017

We’ve started collecting the recent comment and actions by Stirchley residents, councillors, media and other stakeholders around Birmingham Council’s U-turn to allow Lidl to knock down a local gym and bowling alley. On Twitter, if you post #stirchley in your Tweets, we’ll continue to pick them up. We’re unable to collect Facebook group discussions at this time.

Contents: 1. Planning links. 2. Petitions. 3. Background. 4. Councillor actions. 5-10. Key issues. 11. Media.

SuperStirchley: Campaign against Birmingham City Council’s U-turn decision for a Lidl on Pershore Road

January 1, 2017

Concerned residents have reactivated this blog and the twitter @SuperStirchley to rally together, share campaign news & discuss the Birmingham City Council (BCC) U-turn on / Lidl decision.

For info (more below) SuperStirchley was set up in 2011 by residents who came together in retaliation to Asda/Tesco planning applications.

SuperStirchley is back for 2017: this time opposing Lidl.

Thousands of residents object to Lidl building on the proposed site – we are angry that Birmingham City Council have approved this application in a U-turn decision. The approval means we risk losing our only gym and bowls for miles. Many residents aren’t anti-Lidl, and welcome more choice in shopping in Stirchley elsewhere. 

About the Lidl campaign

Lidl’s first and second applications to build a store in Stirchley on the Pershore Road site – currently occupied by Fitness First Stirchley and PSL Bowling – were rejected by Birmingham City Council’s Planning Committee on both occasions in 2016.

Lidl appealed the second rejected application (dated 8th December) and on 22nd December, BCC made a U-turn and the Lidl proposal.

The decision has left the whole community, including its local councillors (across several political parties), shocked and disappointed.

We will be campaigning against this decision in support of Fitness First Stirchley and PSL Bowling.

We feel that this site is the wrong location for the Lidl store for the following reasons:

  • Loss of PSL Bowling – a family run, independent business that supports local economy. Nearest alternative approximately 4 miles away
  • Loss of Fitness First Stirchley – a popular fitness gym with over 3800 members amidst reports of a growing obesity crisis costing Birmingham over £2 billion every year
  • Loss of jobs – 62+ people are set to lose their jobs across the 2 sites with Lidl only committing to 20 full time staff
  • Further traffic disruption – concerns over increased volume of traffic on an already highly congested route and impact on residents parking
  • Alternative Stirchley sites available – derelict site owned by Tesco,  proposed new Aldi store on Magnet site, old KwikSave site
  • There are already enough supermarkets – 19 supermarkets in a 3 mile radius

We are campaigning for Birmingham City Council to reconsider its decision and will be posting news about this on this blog and over on our twitter @SuperStirchley.

In the mean time, you can sign the online petition: STAND UP FOR STIRCHLEY PETITION

We encourage you to comment on the petition with your views. 

We are also collecting views on twitter via Storify which you can read here: STORIFY LINK.

If you tag your tweet with ‘Stirchley’ we are able to pick it up easily and add to the Storify.


In other news:

Aldi planning application:

Supermarket Aldi has also put in a planning application at the other end of Stirchley on the Magnet site. You can read more about this here: Details Page for Planning Application – 2016/10105/PA The deadline for resident comments is 12th January. Do have your say.

Next Neighbourhood Forum:

Monday 12th January 7.30pm Stirchley Community Church. Their guest for the evening is a representative from TESCO. Ask them your questions: such as, Why did you not oppose the Lidl planning application?

Stirchley Library Services:

There are proposals to move Stirchley Library Services into newly refurbished Stirchley Baths. This could leave another void on Stirchley High Street, and we don’t know how Stirchley Baths will accommodate the services. Have your say: Library Services Consultation


What’s SuperStirchley?

In 2011 SuperStirchley was set up by residents of Stirchley and surrounding areas to campaign to keep Stirchley independent, and promote everything that’s good about Stirchley. Stirchley was threatened by two supermarket developments back then, TESCO & Asda:

  • TESCO has been on the cards for nearly 15 years. The supermarket were approved planning permission to build a store on/around Hazelwell Lane – and since SuperStirchley deactivated in 2012, all the buildings from Co-op funeral shop to Webbs Power Tools, including the Stirchley Community Centre, Busy B’s café and rows of houses, have all been demolished to make way for TESCO that few think will ever arrive. Stirchley is now left with wasteland, they haven’t started on any building work: only demolition.
  • In 2011 ASDA put in proposals to build on industrial land at Fordhouse Lane, just 400m from the proposed TESCO store. SuperStirchley campaigned against the ASDA proposal and this got rejected in 2012. Planning permission for a new housing development on the site was approved in 2015.